Term | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Schwartz, Victor E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Behrens, Mark A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Tedesco, Rochelle M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-08-08T17:40:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-08-08T17:40:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 82 Or. L. Rev. 33 (2003) | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0196-2043 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1794/4775 | |
dc.description | 42 p. | en |
dc.format.extent | 159554 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.publisher | University of Oregon School of Law | en |
dc.subject | Exemplary damages | |
dc.subject | Punitive damages | |
dc.title | Oregon Law Review : Vol. 82, No. 1, p. 033-074 : Selective Due Process: The United States Supreme Court Has Said That Punitive Damages Awards Must Be Reviewed for Excessiveness, but Many Courts Are Failing to Follow the Letter and Spirit of the Law | en |
dc.title.alternative | Selective Due Process: The United States Supreme Court Has Said That Punitive Damages Awards Must Be Reviewed for Excessiveness, but Many Courts Are Failing to Follow the Letter and Spirit of the Law | en |
dc.title.alternative | The United States Supreme Court Has Said That Punitive Damages Awards Must Be Reviewed for Excessiveness, but Many Courts Are Failing to Follow the Letter and Spirit of the Law | en |
dc.type | Article | en |