Term | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kunreuther, Howard | |
dc.contributor.author | Slovic, Paul | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-06-14T21:46:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-06-14T21:46:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kunreuther, H., & Slovic, P. (1999). Coping with stigma: Challenges & opportunities. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment, 10, 269-280. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1794/22435 | |
dc.description | 45 pages | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This final section considers what can be done to cope with stigma. Kunreuther and Slovic identify four strategies for coping with stigma. Walker, in a response to Kunreuther and Slovic, questions the assumption that society ought to adopt the normative values of reducing stigma through a variety of strategies or techniques. Fischhoff proposes a definition of stigma and draws a number of inferences including that “stigma reflects a moral statement of what constitutes unacceptable behavior.” When this is the case, Fischhoff says that attempts to change or adjust perceptions, evaluations, or behaviors that stigma produces, presume a moral superiority on the part of those applying strategies to cope with stigma. In a final comment, he notes that this “may not be a comfortable, or appropriate, role for social scientists.” | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.rights | Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US | en_US |
dc.subject | Stigma | en_US |
dc.subject | Risk | en_US |
dc.title | Coping with stigma: Challenges & Opportunities | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |